Skip to content
Ars Technica·

🗳️Google's AI Mode Dodges 2020 Election Questions While Answering Most Others

Your AI search results may disagree with each other now

TL;DR

Google's AI Mode answers some presidential election questions directly but refuses others, often sending users to the FEC instead. Answers also shift between users and repeated asks. Google says a fix is coming for 2020 and 2022 Senate queries.

Google's AI Mode will tell you who won most recent presidential elections, but ask about 2020 and it sends you to the Federal Election Commission instead. Same question, different day, different answer. That's the messy reality of the feature right now. If you're building anything on top of search-grounded AI, this is a warning shot. Answers vary by user, change when you re-ask the same question, and depend on whether you're searching from abroad. Google says its election filters are very strict, which explains the refusals, but strict filtering that behaves unpredictably is still a reliability problem for anyone relying on consistent output. Here's the mechanics. Recent elections are verified against news articles and AP data, while older ones lean on historic records. Direct answers reportedly cite Google Civics data on repeat queries. For the 2020 Senate party control question, AI Mode links to the US Senate Party Division history page. Google says the same update that fixes 2020 queries will also fix issues with 2022 Senate races. YouTube, meanwhile, reversed its policy banning videos making false claims about the 2020 election.

Google's AI Mode Dodges 2020 Election Questions While Answering Most Others — Ars Technica

Key Points

1

AI Mode can directly answer who won every presidential election going back to 2000, but it does not do so consistently for every question type.

Keep reading — it's free

Enter your email to keep reading — plus the best of AI & tech, daily. Free, forever.

Also get
or

Already a member? Sign in

GoogleAI ModeElectionsSearchMisinformation

Comments

Subscribe to join the conversation...

Be the first to comment